Government Decides to Delay Sugar Tax Decision

The government has announced that it will delay the publication of its childhood obesity strategy, effectively postponing a decision about a potential sugar tax.

Sources close to the Conservative party have indicated that it is now likely to be published in the summer, and that the concept of sugar tax is certainly not off the table.

There has been a large degree of speculation about the reasons behind the postponement of this critical document, but the Department of Health has already responded on the matter.

A statement from the department indicated that there is simply more work to do on finalising the final recommendations of the document, despite suggestions David Cameron may have delayed publication because he is concerned with the EU referendum at present.

Cameron had previously indicated that he was somewhat hostile to the concept of a sugar tax, but comments last month seem to indicate that he had softened somewhat on the subject.

In a U-turn prompted by new medical evidence, the PM commented that obesity was leading to diabetes, heart disease and potentially cancer, and that a sugar tax could be a viable solution that needed to be investigated.

The concept of a sugar tax remains controversial, with some critics suggesting that it goes against the principle of freedom of choice, and others pointing to a similar policy’s failure in Denmark.

Commenting on the issue, Cameron stated the following.

“Of course it would be far better if we could make progress on all these issues without having to resort to taxes. That would be my intention. But what matters is that we do make progress. We need to look at this in the same way in the past we have looked at the dangers of smoking to health and other health-related issues.”

While numerous high profile individuals have backed the idea of the sugar tax, the position of Simon Stevens, the head of NHS England, is thought to have had a significant influence over Cameron.

Stevens suggested that a sugar tax between 10% and 20% could work effectively.

There are now four million diabetics living in Britain, and treating the condition costs the health service almost £10bn annually.

Alison Cox, Cancer Research UK’s director of prevention, was critical of the decision to delay this report.

“David Cameron has called children’s obesity a crisis and yet the Government has failed the next generation by stalling on one of its own health priorities. While the Government delays, more children will become obese. Our survey shows people want the Government to act to fight children’s obesity – eight out of 10 think it’s a problem.”

Tam Fry, from the National Obesity Forum, similarly believed that the strategy needs to be published as soon as possible.

“This constant delay in publishing the childhood obesity strategy is unforgivable and the Department of Health’s statement that they ‘want to get it right’ is the most ridiculous and lame excuse.”

 
[ Readmore. ]

Hospitals Failing to Strike Right Note on Nutrition

A survey carried out by The Observer newspaper suggests that hospitals in the NHS are sending out a mixed message by stocking vending machines with unhealthy food and drinks.

According to the survey of hospital trusts in England, all of the 76 trusts who responded sold confectionary and salty snacks, while as many as half failed to offer plain dried or fresh fruit.

And of the 60 trusts that provided information related to soft drinks, only two – the Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust and the Bolton NHS Foundation Trust – have restricted the availability of fizzy drinks to diet versions.

It should be said in mitigation that diet fizzy drinks have come under as much criticism as their full sugar equivalents, with artificial sweeteners such as aspartame being linked with a wide variety of health problems.

Whether diet fizzy drinks would actually be healthier than full sugar variants is debatable. What could be said is that water or some form of pure fruit juice would be a considerably superior option to any form of soda.

Hospitals have come under pressure to improve the quality of food on offer to patients and staff, as it has become increasingly clear that the nutritional value of food served in hospitals is sometimes negligible.

Only last month, Simon Stevens, chief executive of NHS England, called on hospitals to improve the quality of food being offered, and to serve healthy options in restaurants, cafes and vending machines.

The health regulator Nice has already advised that only 20 per cent of vending machine drinks should be sweetened by significant amounts of sugar.

Additionally, sweetened drinks should be sold in site is no greater than 330ml.

But Freedom of information requests issued by The Guardian indicate that most of us in the UK are in fact ignoring these regulations.

For example, vending machines at the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust offer nineteen different varieties of sugary soft drinks or juice drinks and two flavoured milk-shake drinks.

Speaking on behalf of the National Obesity Forum, Tam Fry stated that hospitals needed to more reflect an ethos of healthy eating.

“They’re stoking up business for themselves; particularly with obesity and diabetes, you don’t want to see more of them [patients]; you want to see fewer. One of the ways to see more is to ply them with sugary drinks,” Fry opined.

Susan Jebb, professor of diet and population health at Oxford, suggested that pricing is also an issue.

“The problem is that the choice is biased in favour of the less healthy option by price, availability and portion size. Even the manufacturers say that if you take those bottles of sugary drinks it’s not one serving, it’s two – so why have we got 500ml bottles in vending machines, which are supposed to be about single-unit purchases?”

In May, 2014, it was reported that the UK is one of the most obese countries in Europe.

The UK has higher levels of obesity and overweight people than anywhere in western Europe except for Iceland and Malta according to the Global Burden of Disease study.

 
[ Readmore. ]
This site uses cookies. Find out more about this site’s cookies.