According to the Chief Executive of NHS England, the plans of the Chancellor of the Exchequer for the funding of the health service are simply not workable.
George Osborne has already outlined his scheme for NHS funding until the end of the decade, with the forthcoming spending review thought to be of particular importance.
However, ahead of the release of this formal document, Simon Stevens has indicated his belief that negotiations on health funding require considerable progress.
Stevens suggested that the level of funding promised by George Osborne could not be reasonably described as genuinely workable.
With a £30 billion deficit facing the NHS between now and the end of the decade, Osborne had already pledged an increase of £8 billion in spending by 2020.
The further gap in funding is to be achieved via efficiency savings according to the plans of the Conservative government.
However, Stevens has stated his belief that it is a vital for the NHS to pledge extra cash in the short-term in order to kickstart service changes that will lead to desired savings in the longer term.
“As of today, considerably more progress is going to be needed before we can say we have a genuinely workable NHS funding solution for 2016-17 and 2017-18, but spending reviews usually come down to the wire, so hopefully we’ll get there by 25 November,” Stevens stated.
The NHS is merely one department reliant on government spending that will be affected by the forthcoming review.
In a statement in November, the Chancellor of the Exchequer already indicated that the Department of Communities and Local Government will have their budgets cut by 8 per cent on an annual basis.
Similar cuts have also been made with regard to the Department for Transport and Environment.
Meanwhile, Osborne is reportedly still in talks with a raft of cabinet ministers ahead of the key funding information release date.
Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith, Home Secretary Theresa May and Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond have all been in discussion with the Chancellor over potential cuts to the departmental budgets.
Decisions to cut government departmental spending can be seen in the context of the overall economic position of the United Kingdom.
The British government is currently in the region of £1.7 trillion in debt, with the figure inching ever closer to 100 per cent of GDP.
This is compounded by a spending deficit still in the region of £100 billion per year.
Although the £1.7 trillion figure may sound substantial in itself, when unfunded liabilities are taken into consideration the real scale of debt is likely to be somewhere between 3 to 4 times this number.
New research has indicated that soldiers who have served in the UK armed forces are 50 per cent more likely to develop motor neurone disease that those who have not.
The survey in question has been published in the Occupational and Environmental Medicine journal, and assesses a significance Tranche of over 57,000 armed forces veterans.
Motor neurone disease is an incurable neurodegenerative condition that attacks nerves in the brain and spinal cord.
The condition ultimately leads to progressive paralysis, and is considered extremely debilitating.
Although it is a relatively rare condition, motor neurone disease nonetheless affects 5,000 people in the United Kingdom alone.
Several previous studies carried out in the United States, where motor neurone disease is referred to as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, have linked the condition to military service in the Gulf region.
But this latest study, carried out by researchers at the University of Glasgow, examine a number of Scottish veterans who have served in the British armed forces.
All subjects of the report were born between 1945 and 1985, and that the study was sure to acquire a wide range of subjects with a diverse raft of experience.
Length of service was also subjected to alterations in order to ensure the most valid dataset possible.
The study particularly examined the rate of hospitalisation and death from motor neurone disease, and found that subjects involved had a 50 per cent higher risk of developing the disease compared with people who had never served in the armed forces.
However, no link was established to any particular deployment, and it was also found that length of service had no impact on the likelihood of developing the condition.
Although further research is required in order to understand the reasons behind the results, it has been suggested that a higher rate of smoking in the military could be partly responsible.
And although there is clearly an increased risk of developing motor neurone disease in the armed forces, researchers are still believe that veterans and serving personnel should not worry unduly about the issue.
Motor neurone disease remains an extremely rare condition, and ultimately the chances of contracting it are still pretty slim even for those serving in the armed forces.
But the results of the report do imply a need to examine the issue further with the hope of understanding the root causes of this statistical anomaly.
Commenting on the findings of the research, the lead researcher, Beverly Bergman, stated: “This is an important study which has confirmed an increased risk in military personnel. We also showed that there was a higher risk in everyone who had experienced an injury, but the risk was greater in people who had served in the armed forces.
“Because the cases occurred over such a long period of time, we are confident that there is no specific link to Gulf war service, although higher rates of military smoking may explain the increased risk. This is a very rare disease and veterans should not worry unduly.”