Unite Union Criticises Government Position on NHS and TTIP

The largest trade union in Britain has criticised the claim that government officials were reluctant to put protections for the NHS into a controversial trans-Atlantic trade deal.

Unite has been hugely opposed to the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) deal between Europe and the US, and has particularly suggested that it poses a future to the public nature of the NHS.

The union has been campaigning against the deal, and opined that the European commission deems the notion of excluding the NHS from the impact of the agreement incompatible with its overall negotiating strategy.

While Unite has been hugely critical of TTI P, other organisations and credential individuals have been similarly dismissive, concerned about the potential impact of the deal.

Many political critics of the trade partnership suggest that the deal would effectively make privatisation of the NHS irreversible for future administrations.

There is also concern that private companies with links to NHS contracts will be able to win higher levels of compensation by effectively bypassing domestic courts.

Despite the fact that the major political parties have all backed the European Union, the Labour leader Jeremy Corbin has nonetheless criticised the agreement.

Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel Prize-winning economist recruited by the shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, to advise the Labour party, earlier this month went as far as saying the UK could be better off leaving the EU if TTIP was signed.

Unite’s assistant general secretary, Gail Cartmail, gave a statement to the media in which she outlined the concerns of the union about this trade deal.

“Given the importance of the NHS and the fierce debate taking place in the UK over the European Union, you would expect the EU commissioner for trade to act without delay to allay our concerns over the impact of TTIP on the NHS. It is time for Cecilia Malmström to make clear that the UK government can act to exempt the NHS from TTIP without opposition from the commission. The NHS is hugely important to people in the UK; Cecilia Malmstrom must answer these important questions without delay.”

And as the union continues to criticise the government’s position on both the NHS and TTIP, it is clear that meetings have been brokered between the two sides in the dispute.

A spokeswoman for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills confirmed that a private meeting took place with Unite last month.

However, no statement has been made on the substance of this confab.

“The government has always been clear that protecting the NHS is of the utmost importance for the UK and will not be compromised for gains in any other part of the TTIP deal. We believe, as does the European commission, that provisions in the current TTIP texts and previous trade deals achieve this protection.”

TTIP has been reviled on both sides of the Atlantic by campaigners for offering too much power to the existing corporate sector.

 
[ Readmore. ]

Unite Union Calls Conference to Discuss Future of the NHS

The Unite trade union has announced what it has described as “a key conference” to discuss the existing state of the NHS.

A particular subject of the conference will be what Unite deems to be the “right-wing ideological tide that is engulfing” the health service.

This open discussion forum in London comes at a time when there is a political schism occurring in Great Britain.

The new direction of the Labour party under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn will likely contrast significantly with the existing Conservative government, despite promises that the Tories have made with regard to the NHS.

Unite have stated that the conference will broach a wide variety of topics.

These will include doctors planning to work abroad because of the proposed 24/7 working contracts for junior doctors, and healthcare for the victims of torture, asylum seekers and refugees. 

Other items on the agenda will be the devolution of healthcare to the countries and cities, private finance initiatives (PFI); torture, asylum seekers and refugees, 24/7 working, and bullying and whistleblowing.

The conference will be entitled “Doctors and Medical Students – our role in saving the NHS”, with the aim of bringing together passionate healthcare professionals from all over the UK.

Dr Clare Gerada, former chair, Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) and former medical advisor to NHS London, is booked to address the conference, with numerous other prominent speakers also expected.

Several organisations are expected to provide speakers for the conference, among these Crash Call for the NHS, Doctors in Unite, Doctors of the World UK, Medact, Medsin, NHS Doctors for the NHS, NHS Survival, Patients First and the Socialist Health Association.

Commenting on the potential of this conference, United chair Dr Ron Singer made reference to the ascension of Corbyn the position of Labour leadership.

“Recent political events show that many people want something hopeful and positive from politicians. This chimes with the enduring popularity of the NHS as publicly owned and providing a high quality service. In contrast, there is deep hostility from the public to the accelerating privatisation agenda,” Singer asserted.

The chair also placed into contact the importance of healthcare professionals with regard to this critical issue.

“Doctors and medical students will have greater impact on policy decisions and spearheading public opinion, if they can work closer together. We hope that by agreeing common ground and discussing ‘the difficult bits’ doctors and students will be more able to campaign for a better NHS and social care future for patients and staff,” Singer stated.

The conference will be staged on Saturday 17th of October, with the meeting to be held at Unite House, 128 Theobald’s Road, Holborn, London WC1X 8TN between 11.00 and 16.00.

Doctors and medical students wishing to book a place can do so via Eventbrite.

 
[ Readmore. ]

GMB Union Calls for Increased Care Home Funding

GMB has called for care home fees to be increased to £600 a week, as a response to what the trade union describes as “years of chronic underfunding.”

A motion calling for fairer funding for social care was debated, and ultimately carried, at the TUC Congress in Brighton.

According to figures provided by GMB, the gap in funding for adult social care is growing by £700 million every year, and is projected to reach a gulf of £4.3 billion by the end of the decade.

Justin Bowden, GMB National Officer, spoke passionately in favour of the motion in Brighton. “A time bomb is ticking under the system of care for our elderly and vulnerable, the product of chronic underfunding and society’s failure to face up to its responsibilities to those – who paid tax and national insurance all their lives – in their times of need.”

To put the importance of adult care into perspective, 5 per cent of the general population will require this service at some point during their lives.

Over 400,000 people are currently in residential care in the United Kingdom, and the provision of these services provides one-million jobs nationwide.

In addition, 800,000 other residents of the United Kingdom currently receive care in their own homes.

GMB suggested several provisions that should be implemented within the care system as soon as possible if disaster is to be averted.

The first of these, and the central pillar of the motion forwarded in Brighton, is the suggestion that fees must rise immediately to at least £600 a week.

This figure was included in the Rowntree Foundation Fair Care Model, which attempted to calculate a fair market price for care.

Secondly, GNB believes that a new independent training commission should be formed, with the responsibility of ensuring the supply of UK care staff for all occupations.

The union also believes that government funding must be directed into universal standards of care sector training.

GMB suggests that this could take place via training support grants to the public and private sectors.

Finally, GMB also notes that care workers are typically poorly paid, and considers this to be completely unacceptable for what should be considered a critical service industry.

With this in mind, GNB believes that all care workers should be paid at least the existing living wage of £7.85 per hour and £9.20 per hour in London, in line with the living wage campaign.

The GMB motion asserted that “without serious fees and funding increases, more Southern Cross style collapses are inevitable, more care homes will be closed and more care beds lost.  The knock-on effects on the NHS are obvious and imminent: more people will be hospitalised – and for longer – and the NHS will buckle and break.”

The trade union will doubtless be encouraged by the recent election of Jeremy Corbyn to the position of leader of the Labour party.

Corbyn has previously indicated strong support for the NHS, and has made it a key element of the Labour party ethos going forward.

 
[ Readmore. ]

GMB Members Angry Over Inept Managers’ Golden Handshake

Members of the GMB are seeking assurances that managers who submit resignations will not receive compensation.

There are concerns among the trade union that golden handshakes or other forms of pay-off could be offered to resigning managers, damaging trust in the NHS.

The hierarchy of the GMB has made it clear that members believe managers being rewarded for what are deemed “dismal failures” should be considered completely unacceptable.

Speaking on behalf of union members, Gary Palmer, GMB Organiser, pointed out that members were far from happy with current managerial proposals.

“Concerns that any further management who resign could receive golden handshakes, has resulted in GMB members calling for complete clarity around NHS money funding any potential pay-offs in rewarding such dismal failures by those entrusted to manage the NHS Trust on our behalf,” Palmer asserted.

In addition to the concerns about the managerial culture in the NHS, GMB members are also calling upon East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust to clarify a particular issue.

There have been strong rumours that the Trust will be placed into special measures potentially as soon as later this month.

East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust includes both the Conquest and Eastbourne District General hospitals.

Should this move come to fruition, it would represent just a six-month gap since the Care Quality Commission (CQC) graded the Trust with an inadequate rating.

The CQC found that there were significant failures in the quality of care offered by the trust, with hospitals failing to deliver adequate service in a number of key areas.

It was noted that hospitals under the care of this trust were particularly culpable with regard to the critical area of safety and management.

And it is thought that this played a major role in the resignation of Chief Executive Darren Grayson earlier this year.

Speaking passionately on this issue, the aforementioned Palmer outlined the strength of feeling on the matter within the membership of the GMB union.

GMB members and staff are shocked and understandably angry that not only have the Trust management put patients and services at risk to a point that placing the Trust into special measures could be required to finally turn things around, but that those responsible for the troubles at the Trust, namely the senior management team including Stuart Welling, could potentially be recipients of substantial NHS pay offs if they choose to resign as a result,” Palmer stated.

With the issue clearly provoking strong feeling among NHS staff in the region, this would seem to be an issue that will run and run in the coming months.

 
[ Readmore. ]
This site uses cookies. Find out more about this site’s cookies.